Search
Months
- May 2012
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Blogroll
Recent Entries
- The Descent into Police-State Hell
- So Long, Space Shuttle, and Good Riddance
- The (insurgent) Campaign for Liberty (2008)
- So Long, Kodak
- Ron Paul’s Speech After New Hampshire Primary
- What Went Wrong in 2008 On Wall Street
- Winner of the NH Debate – RON PAUL!
- No Pornoscan, No Way
- So Long, American Express
- Congress Officially “Deplores” Iraqi Torture by US Troops

So Long, Kodak
Just looking at consumer photo, digital photography RADICALLY decreased the cost of taking usable pictures. I used to take hundreds of film pictures in a year. The expense was terrific, and you got ten you didnt want for one you did, if even that. Now you can take hundreds of pictures in an afternoon, and you only need to pay to print the ones you want, AND you can send them to friends, include them in documents, reports, etc. Kodak not only failed to cannibalize themselves, they failed to consider the value of this innovation to their CUSTOMERS, and it was only a matter of time before others did.